{"id":"W2168084509","doi":"10.1007/s10651-007-0084-2","title":"Interpreting and using outputs from the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in research applications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Environmental science; Fire protection; Rating system; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Fire prevention; Computer science; Meteorology; Geography; Agroforestry; Architectural engineering; Environmental economics; Civil engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004769646,0.0001113632,0.0001325565,0.00001655775,0.0009156895,0.0000448678,0.0001319533,0.00008717951,0.0002123627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006860878,0.00008115959,0.00001024005,0.00007118328,0.00054602,0.00006579465,0.0002676618,0.000267548,0.0001143726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007539396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008573334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2177458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987168,0.0002050865,0.0002043621,0.0003129705,0.0002160968,0.0003447287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998936,0.000724146,0.00004690048,0.0001262213,0.000001351073,0.0001654024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005261649,0.00003345819,0.9909248,0.000007503849,0.000004022902,0.00006807801,0.0007356241,0.0001295302,0.0005062709,0.0001289123,0.0002382678,0.007218305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001405112,0.00006322352,0.9089719,0.00001828896,0.000004198038,0.00003708124,0.0005825522,0.08804039,0.000009757132,0.0001626564,0.001855048,0.0001143983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979371,0.0001307981,0.0006300348,0.00007347625,0.00003367839,0.0005104634,0.0001785394,0.00000979764,0.0004961268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968408,0.0000312065,0.002852608,0.00009567451,0.00003390614,0.00007425479,0.00002759408,0.000009604084,0.00003435485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09619886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8843027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04067753946164671,"score_gpt":0.2625917239552995,"score_spread":0.2219141844936528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}