{"id":"W2168084509","doi":"10.1007/s10651-007-0084-2","title":"Interpreting and using outputs from the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in research applications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Environmental science; Fire protection; Rating system; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Fire prevention; Computer science; Meteorology; Geography; Agroforestry; Architectural engineering; Environmental economics; Civil engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01694627,0.00126294,0.0007512537,0.008655884,0.001925594,0.004743299,0.001470487,0.0007143006,0.003631157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08744124,0.0004965833,0.0005824865,0.01242937,0.0006963853,0.00155945,0.001153214,0.0008807082,0.001028554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02731224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9160267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926431,0.002583295,0.0008265984,0.0006369387,0.002738393,0.0005716925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437947,0.02493949,0.002431533,0.002498118,0.02530579,0.001030392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008501611,0.0001908399,0.4547473,0.0006212863,0.0003844399,0.0003529371,0.002239859,0.04716436,0.006643946,0.007203322,0.06137692,0.4182246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001878237,0.0001550509,0.5476601,0.0005742846,0.0007520428,0.000199464,0.005716883,0.3196846,0.02398497,0.02096731,0.07974942,0.0003681062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5820677,0.002438764,0.2643982,0.007607577,0.0004147925,0.001546302,0.06580065,0.01184686,0.06387917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7590548,0.001287588,0.2137883,0.0004476977,0.0001020963,0.0003955563,0.01764683,0.0009268673,0.006350328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08397329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1689356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04067753946164671,"score_gpt":0.2625917239552995,"score_spread":0.2219141844936528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}