{"id":"W2168196608","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00855.x","title":"Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":319,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service","keywords":"Periphyton; Riparian buffer; Riparian zone; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); STREAMS; Buffer strip; Ecosystem; Photosynthetically active radiation; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecology; Benthic zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Water quality; Habitat; Botany; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002887184,0.00008610591,0.0002416959,0.00007287581,0.00004298124,0.000002581398,0.00008701321,0.00009031267,0.0005532104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002128795,0.00007545551,0.0000306024,0.00008886791,0.0001518874,0.00008966782,0.00001975826,0.00008374338,0.000004430623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003341231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000223448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002448541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002042217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.00003249578,0.0003742745,0.0001143987,0.0001248843,0.0001363076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.00006275374,0.000242306,0.00007110495,0.00001091735,0.00007277507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001308296,0.0003722983,0.8396409,0.00002155076,0.00005922172,0.00001976539,0.001903662,0.00787507,0.1468358,0.001139375,0.00007947998,0.0007445356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001020499,0.001188544,0.8179044,0.000007739543,0.00004098503,0.00005197814,0.0003118268,0.00003864212,0.1774402,0.001124332,0.000775874,0.00009497195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997398,0.00005509503,0.00009806643,0.00006556368,0.00007619915,0.0001142254,0.000001151271,0.000002390571,0.002189364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983461,0.00001345091,0.001478815,0.0001262936,0.0000105059,0.000004149789,7.41608e-7,0.000006176017,0.00001369561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0306044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01011225170763104,"score_gpt":0.2282510101711679,"score_spread":0.2181387584635369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}