{"id":"W2168302836","doi":"10.1139/x07-104","title":"Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Foundation of Emergency Medicine","keywords":"Mathematics; Mean squared error; Douglas fir; Statistics; Tree (set theory); Position (finance); Nonlinear system; Mean squared prediction error; Forestry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008948643,0.000853948,0.0004651809,0.0008668292,0.0003221977,0.0006192797,0.0009439475,0.0003901372,0.0005410753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01450084,0.0003229734,0.0006666022,0.0004935074,0.0002599576,0.001040125,0.000746201,0.0004895792,0.0002440473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001036774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009184539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02279857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0393493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998909,0.0006491035,0.00006548418,0.0002307775,0.000105572,0.00003996186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865445,0.01154371,0.0004434721,0.0004724808,0.0008748676,0.0001208757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001094184,0.0004034026,0.2945562,0.0002502677,0.0004654943,0.0001575895,0.0005860795,0.4953779,0.005031513,0.001530552,0.0006805627,0.1998662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000275446,0.00009757663,0.03007875,0.0000103672,0.00003758396,0.00003446869,0.00007614727,0.96737,0.001487613,0.0005580591,0.0001961484,0.00002576229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.930172,0.0002154858,0.0681787,0.00009736818,0.000006920104,0.00005841537,0.0004488392,0.0002905555,0.0005317383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320364,0.0001202222,0.06553559,0.0000263431,0.000005507298,0.00007685197,0.001619803,0.00007646422,0.0005027661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02279857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04732549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04480752628206097,"score_gpt":0.3170150596677049,"score_spread":0.2722075333856439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}