{"id":"W2168355585","doi":"10.1109/cicc.1994.379772","title":"A quick way to find the optimized performance of a power constrained logic circuit","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Low-power high-performance VLSI design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Path (computing); Constraint (computer-aided design); Realization (probability); Power (physics); Function (biology); CMOS; Class (philosophy); Range (aeronautics); Logic gate; Computer engineering; Algorithm; Electronic engineering; Computer network; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003105723,0.001298111,0.0005286406,0.0008945347,0.0003873203,0.0008079708,0.0005627582,0.0006359266,0.01211954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001453034,0.0005142512,0.000471936,0.0005847914,0.0004585788,0.001280877,0.000378785,0.001007827,0.002955512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006434629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006910013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001080021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001271283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998527,0.00002113447,0.000007335052,0.00003495215,0.00006820502,0.00001567863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997637,0.0001067998,0.00002715332,0.00003168141,0.00006401257,0.000006714249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001522832,0.00005140774,0.0006545722,0.0005236613,0.0001335625,0.0002336031,0.0001633552,0.4151462,0.09912892,0.1247624,0.01681,0.34224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008323514,0.0002277471,0.0006230711,0.0001028556,0.00006904926,0.0003134041,0.000065188,0.7842476,0.09349287,0.07702234,0.04366934,0.00008333348],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006420407,0.0001852724,0.9837916,0.000149745,0.00004772873,0.00005671117,0.0002086304,0.001549127,0.007590766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1158686,0.0005486142,0.8731775,0.0001515481,0.00003858358,0.0002468559,0.0003440393,0.0009365177,0.008687742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01211954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04054385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0186062108418449,"score_gpt":0.1928771333902915,"score_spread":0.1742709225484466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}