{"id":"W2168356773","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1207.1411","title":"Bayes' Bluff: Opponent Modelling in Poker","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Games","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Computer science; Adversary; Artificial intelligence; Dirichlet distribution; Fictitious play; Bluff; Probabilistic logic; Domain (mathematical analysis); Task (project management); Class (philosophy); Observability; Machine learning; Bayesian probability; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006038558,0.0008945987,0.001264672,0.0007897117,0.001101574,0.002301875,0.00233551,0.002806106,0.005697268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02222631,0.0008589231,0.001098733,0.0006474782,0.004174096,0.004347029,0.002822907,0.004192932,0.0008151547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001791723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001410068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00491031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004899348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972231,0.00159951,0.0000732969,0.0003907299,0.0004888682,0.0002244261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991744,0.007087934,0.0003478821,0.0003922355,0.0002217363,0.000206088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009400884,0.00003294279,0.0009878427,0.00006801232,0.00004131726,0.0001695834,0.0005629575,0.2460406,0.0004718978,0.7343738,0.001344832,0.01581234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001434052,0.00001283282,0.0001164704,0.00001719399,0.000007914968,0.00004066231,0.00004313634,0.5579724,0.0001858188,0.4404287,0.001146557,0.00001391488],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01634452,0.000226044,0.9723462,0.0015599,0.0000519807,0.00004008343,0.00006339021,0.0001246017,0.009243328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7908402,0.0005282209,0.1895617,0.000790116,0.0001695033,0.0002518967,0.0001551174,0.0001809569,0.01752232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006038558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03193533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1747774249227732,"score_gpt":0.2159533918694924,"score_spread":0.04117596694671916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}