{"id":"W2168475075","doi":"10.1177/0894439302238967","title":"New Technologies and Institutional Change in Public Administration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Computer Review","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"New institutionalism; Incentive; Interdependence; Government (linguistics); Civil society; Public administration; Corporate governance; Constitution; Institutional economics; Multidisciplinary approach; Business; Institutional analysis; Administration (probate law); Public sector; Institutional change; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Market economy; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008163276,0.0002510853,0.0003882809,0.003541716,0.004762947,0.01242622,0.001201015,0.002182331,0.003777442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01189845,0.0003098625,0.0004887196,0.003620813,0.03323303,0.01092264,0.005701089,0.002225257,0.000373527],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01056522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007101614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004009817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004240125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883061,0.007301196,0.0004391178,0.000817153,0.001899866,0.001236497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843306,0.00884391,0.003369728,0.001430162,0.001189266,0.0008364439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001079914,0.00004841424,0.002334864,0.00008848101,0.00001559178,0.0001701313,0.007660212,0.001877628,0.0001575963,0.975089,0.0005301744,0.01201696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003805207,0.0001220317,0.009050822,0.0004286212,0.00003092653,0.0004061689,0.0278801,0.003372401,0.000814551,0.7607161,0.197066,0.00007407457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.355503,0.02133234,0.07298518,0.06513065,0.0006494536,0.0002685399,0.0001096917,0.0001771717,0.4838439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990012,0.002539157,0.002469483,0.0005937267,0.000165521,0.00005882947,0.00001999302,0.0000116002,0.004129852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01242622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0766564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09265056935653945,"score_gpt":0.3624707921777092,"score_spread":0.2698202228211697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}