{"id":"W2168705386","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2010.11.004","title":"Extending the enforcement power of truncation monitors using static analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Security","topic":"Security and Verification in Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; A priori and a posteriori; Truncation (statistics); Intuition; Enforcement; Alphabet; Static analysis; Computer security; Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Law; Programming language; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007528313,0.001066464,0.001370506,0.001706832,0.001191695,0.003102135,0.00274171,0.001483715,0.003563244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02780378,0.001299332,0.001669728,0.001103497,0.003598939,0.006414063,0.004232413,0.003861246,0.0008108017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00129271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00414125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003482916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898849,0.003221978,0.0007619444,0.001222111,0.003870271,0.001038852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605271,0.0178091,0.002561207,0.01504858,0.003570549,0.0004834679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001695194,0.0004188453,0.01164465,0.0007507542,0.0003141252,0.0007715857,0.001439724,0.1158613,0.06854735,0.3567221,0.00748006,0.4343543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001942961,0.0003335117,0.0008986201,0.0001678569,0.0003879792,0.0002993562,0.0001032411,0.6985961,0.06385476,0.2229619,0.01207919,0.0001231991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04965135,0.000474042,0.9306682,0.0007443487,0.0001826626,0.0001084472,0.0001472067,0.01075678,0.00726688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.772885,0.0004195021,0.2207253,0.0005092364,0.0002104079,0.00009514573,0.0001635261,0.001209972,0.003782006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007528313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03981405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0177862271512889,"score_gpt":0.2854726528457654,"score_spread":0.2676864256944765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}