{"id":"W2168787337","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.49.4.493","title":"The Umpires Strike Back: Canadian Judicial Experience with Risk-Assessment Instruments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Christian ministry; Variety (cybernetics); Proportionality (law); Risk assessment; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Computer security; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08150412,0.0006972459,0.0009867765,0.003692534,0.04348209,0.0192851,0.006809628,0.007962865,0.005506806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1437311,0.001078182,0.001002226,0.009803085,0.01601055,0.004200109,0.006207119,0.01415953,0.0006527129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2100678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9780812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9042232,0.02491262,0.004713415,0.005071554,0.04828469,0.01279452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8481055,0.03841834,0.003401345,0.004008404,0.09587955,0.01018676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001589896,0.000201077,0.02367762,0.0008566304,0.000088566,0.004299662,0.2382039,0.001701452,0.001702257,0.2801355,0.265191,0.1837834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003250615,0.00009622578,0.02274227,0.001151042,0.00006903362,0.0009954782,0.06892104,0.001331066,0.0009480837,0.006452037,0.8968872,0.0003741528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1971679,0.02779314,0.01188594,0.448393,0.004807025,0.0005937613,0.0006990079,0.0003301257,0.30833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.859979,0.01434768,0.01120619,0.04903768,0.0006320444,0.0001632393,0.000280527,0.0003700467,0.06398372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1330321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9652196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07544352461050009,"score_gpt":0.3453483926961999,"score_spread":0.2699048680856998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}