{"id":"W2168936364","doi":"10.1139/b01-004","title":"The taxonomic and phylogenetic utility of vegetative anatomy and fruit epidermal silica bodies in <i>Carex </i>section <i>Phyllostachys </i>(Cyperaceae)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Carex; Cyperaceae; Biology; Botany; Phylogenetic tree; Systematics; Taxonomy (biology); Phylogenetics; Phyllostachys; Key (lock); Zoology; Ecology; Poaceae; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004151956,0.0001203304,0.0002747169,0.00002929778,0.0003324149,0.00003770728,0.0001218167,0.00006924357,0.00002554414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001370679,0.00005227978,0.00005802751,0.0001290791,0.0004467474,0.0001005217,0.00002255113,0.0001795839,4.831838e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004467906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006629111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001433174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3912202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990161,0.000129733,0.0003594165,0.0001475875,0.00006561448,0.0002815381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.0003482171,0.0002221257,0.0000402601,0.000112993,0.0002093521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004125704,0.0000142283,0.9828942,0.000005190466,0.00004504288,0.00003322016,0.000118416,0.000001604089,0.003399618,0.00002087854,0.0003052242,0.01312113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001968626,0.0002130118,0.9730706,0.00001821655,0.00001708141,0.00008982631,0.001866508,0.00003154934,0.0001295565,0.0004579611,0.02382157,0.00008728886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832311,0.01350837,0.00000120428,0.002258376,0.0001559133,0.0001362088,0.00001994182,0.000002008206,0.0006869062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981068,0.001570627,0.00002959624,0.0001295952,0.0001232981,0.000004541014,1.57015e-7,9.250346e-7,0.00003447678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.389787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6198884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01970681286142375,"score_gpt":0.216728400355998,"score_spread":0.1970215874945742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}