{"id":"W2168948848","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2007.2099","title":"Linking environmental variability and fish performance: integration through the concept of scope for activity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Adaptation (eye); Categorization; Ecology; Environmental stress; Environmental change; Biology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Climate change; Fishery; Environmental science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732847,0.0006165366,0.0006456575,0.002216699,0.0005151675,0.002837207,0.000965056,0.000825711,0.001872784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007033665,0.0003121625,0.0009262621,0.001318731,0.007694901,0.004168347,0.003454239,0.001123622,0.0001427043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001000875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005205098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001518141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001490422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986097,0.0006607904,0.00007431999,0.0002578334,0.0002913825,0.0001060192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248,0.00500671,0.001109772,0.0006845923,0.0003739519,0.0003449445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003713662,0.0001584898,0.1267211,0.0003642792,0.0005327437,0.0004864644,0.005136607,0.04707433,0.006283076,0.6920959,0.0007030184,0.1200728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002909839,0.0004035254,0.1756021,0.0001239742,0.0001301659,0.0005266006,0.001402538,0.02938955,0.0009609368,0.7862968,0.005018032,0.000116705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5710397,0.006846935,0.3553824,0.004059183,0.00009617174,0.00007731206,0.000443238,0.0001438012,0.06191123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866432,0.0006248688,0.01193754,0.0000929325,0.00005814419,0.00005689883,0.00004262525,0.00002125365,0.0005226763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002837207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01445282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03315974711030317,"score_gpt":0.2589920695783821,"score_spread":0.2258323224680789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}