{"id":"W2168948848","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2007.2099","title":"Linking environmental variability and fish performance: integration through the concept of scope for activity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Adaptation (eye); Categorization; Ecology; Environmental stress; Environmental change; Biology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Climate change; Fishery; Environmental science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001272804,0.00009765037,0.0001461001,0.000003684137,0.0009417329,0.000007268336,0.0003283,0.0001076812,0.0001644996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005600723,0.00004697479,0.0001562275,0.0001620628,0.004963647,0.0001166276,0.0001041577,0.000171637,6.847147e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004109253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004452335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003123413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002020045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999092,0.00008039089,0.0001981679,0.0002505552,0.0001860823,0.0001928224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991406,0.0006037815,0.0001126025,0.000115082,0.000005518022,0.00002243582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000539948,0.002388418,0.8511886,0.0001262375,0.0003275168,2.283008e-7,0.00597155,0.01631471,0.008651202,0.01710869,0.0008571698,0.09652573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003729827,0.0007622864,0.9432907,0.00001985481,0.00006802902,8.718474e-7,0.0005447789,0.006429956,0.008854924,0.03903016,0.0004519148,0.0001735669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9459479,0.00001909298,0.04479479,0.006659634,0.000115767,0.0004693159,0.00002430902,0.00001255124,0.001956603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977551,0.0001065035,0.001629327,0.0004410255,0.00002627662,0.00001806906,8.533416e-7,0.000001652449,0.0000211766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09635216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03315974711030317,"score_gpt":0.2589920695783821,"score_spread":0.2258323224680789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}