{"id":"W2169029534","doi":"10.1002/cne.22120","title":"Receptive field organization across multiple electrosensory maps. II. Computational analysis of the effects of receptive field size on prey localization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Comparative Neurology","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Electroreception; Electric fish; Receptive field; Biology; Predation; Population; Lobe; Prey detection; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Neuroscience; Biological system; Sensory system; Anatomy; Ecology; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002983546,0.0001237575,0.0003914084,0.00005403569,0.0001847271,0.000003662225,0.0003263321,0.0001266961,0.0002120528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005617659,0.00007518012,0.0001101529,0.0007002633,0.0003133711,0.00006813442,0.0000728919,0.000335365,0.000004498039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003561154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001818713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001519873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001806397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982705,0.0008072119,0.0004261753,0.0001356307,0.0001964875,0.0001640437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961538,0.002779683,0.0007403683,0.0001504263,0.0001459791,0.0000297559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002708501,0.0009784035,0.5115355,0.000007743302,0.000428788,0.00000492406,0.009939737,0.1950223,0.2689129,0.0001283996,0.009639733,0.0006930211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005328291,0.005964483,0.884751,0.00000659324,0.0002471387,0.00001476054,0.0001182242,0.001590487,0.1061619,0.0004812584,0.00006635797,0.00006496372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960751,0.0000159061,0.001713157,0.001611567,0.0002018173,0.0002263361,0.000006978319,0.000004504098,0.0001446698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969599,0.00002553787,0.0000728834,0.002864914,0.00002663896,0.00000113494,0.000003983102,0.000004052191,0.00004093681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3732154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3065756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0108413052867017,"score_gpt":0.2707114610646634,"score_spread":0.2598701557779617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}