{"id":"W2169029534","doi":"10.1002/cne.22120","title":"Receptive field organization across multiple electrosensory maps. II. Computational analysis of the effects of receptive field size on prey localization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Comparative Neurology","topic":"Fish biology, ecology, and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Electroreception; Electric fish; Receptive field; Biology; Predation; Population; Lobe; Prey detection; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Neuroscience; Biological system; Sensory system; Anatomy; Ecology; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003200037,0.0001702533,0.0002584644,0.0003397394,0.0002016495,0.0004509907,0.000423772,0.0003901303,0.0007432905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001379689,0.0002755133,0.0005840225,0.000171912,0.0003545972,0.0005154469,0.0003133077,0.0002205134,0.00006902449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007992694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004185127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004289485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004008985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999567,0.000009221211,0.00000230796,0.00001286062,0.000008969892,0.000009992868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999604,0.0002708781,0.00005267994,0.00002111727,0.0000274541,0.00002385991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008097451,0.00002290587,0.005409616,0.00003405991,0.00002484155,0.00005752586,0.00005112627,0.9738253,0.009789488,0.00253952,0.0001167922,0.008047941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006497224,0.00001468527,0.002628126,0.000001835475,0.000005677171,0.00002203288,0.00001014701,0.9954283,0.0007278711,0.001111425,0.00003949173,0.000003914628],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429663,0.00009436336,0.05489298,0.0001223511,0.00000385086,0.00002172836,0.0001082229,0.00008002284,0.001710171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872059,0.00003110015,0.01237978,0.00001300703,0.000002498408,0.00002676016,0.00004729172,0.00001013547,0.0002835972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004289485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008529007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0108413052867017,"score_gpt":0.2707114610646634,"score_spread":0.2598701557779617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}