{"id":"W2169080987","doi":"10.1897/ieam_2007-002.1","title":"Evaluating consistency of best professional judgment in the application of a multiple lines of evidence sediment quality triad","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ranking (information retrieval); Statistics; Quality (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Sediment; Computer science; Mathematics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003073721,0.0002083205,0.0003463272,0.00009648776,0.00009651433,0.000004616796,0.0003000477,0.0001070604,0.000356394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000241934,0.0001406347,0.00007827799,0.0002418438,0.0006867062,0.0001391441,0.0003605071,0.0001866029,0.000008736965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002946294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009526654,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002966471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003262355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974162,0.0002984433,0.001015436,0.0003920643,0.0006121109,0.0002657243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985834,0.0004838839,0.0005503508,0.0003288238,0.00000405049,0.00004948677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003218334,0.002635036,0.6332576,0.0001392009,0.00007169614,0.000004617198,0.0005950859,0.0009072439,0.3174112,0.0006386673,0.00005213423,0.04396569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001592761,0.0008821801,0.9508017,0.000151737,0.00009750018,0.00000361276,0.006800298,0.001868316,0.03679152,0.0003586381,0.0004556799,0.0001960934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945382,0.0001406556,0.001758089,0.000185909,0.00009036705,0.001493266,0.00001785015,0.000005493319,0.001770212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923723,0.0003843496,0.006673363,0.0001248059,0.000007771743,0.0001759303,0.00002831072,0.000008908631,0.0002243105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3175441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5734917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1128878109106349,"score_gpt":0.4168850374463267,"score_spread":0.3039972265356918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}