{"id":"W2169102184","doi":"10.1109/aim.2010.5695949","title":"Global optimum human-like gaits for an articulated one-legged hopper","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Locomotion and Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Takeoff; Gait; Effect of gait parameters on energetic cost; Robot; Work (physics); Computer science; Legged robot; Control theory (sociology); Trajectory; Simulation; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Gait analysis; Aerospace engineering; Control (management); Physics; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002611099,0.0003261082,0.0002956926,0.0003803324,0.0001725477,0.0001803715,0.0001783789,0.0003010692,0.00120776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006577298,0.0001928383,0.0002544845,0.0001673525,0.00026252,0.0002028651,0.0002577382,0.000183433,0.0001742801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001482074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002272615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002743686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004843881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999413,0.00001665963,0.000003802553,0.00001098844,0.00002059673,0.000006598435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998486,0.00006255072,0.00002920283,0.00001688774,0.0000278282,0.00001500177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009213902,0.00006069817,0.0008716492,0.00008304301,0.00002264785,0.000155492,0.00009582596,0.9203024,0.01966939,0.007177366,0.0004776517,0.05099164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003161927,0.0001801975,0.0005937408,0.00001144052,0.000009387148,0.00008766527,0.00002386795,0.9898656,0.003513468,0.00509794,0.0005760876,0.000009130236],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2910967,0.0001277946,0.7040104,0.0001118305,0.00001592073,0.00006781813,0.00008303412,0.0004073253,0.004079231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8581991,0.00005947814,0.1402302,0.00001793689,0.000003469394,0.0000830354,0.00008522223,0.00005341653,0.00126803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00120776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00404036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01711624674542971,"score_gpt":0.2565894892729103,"score_spread":0.2394732425274806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}