{"id":"W2169228060","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2010.06.002","title":"Non-orthogonal micro-free flow electrophoresis: From theory to design concept","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytica Chimica Acta","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Electric field; Chemistry; Flow (mathematics); Electrophoresis; Resolution (logic); Electro-osmosis; Mechanics; Flow velocity; Channel (broadcasting); Field (mathematics); Free-flow electrophoresis; Physics; Chromatography; Electrical engineering; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113489,0.0007126011,0.0008998965,0.0004040537,0.0003696367,0.001671099,0.001379922,0.0009123559,0.001036214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001019085,0.0007003653,0.000559978,0.0003124198,0.001463426,0.001730739,0.000840911,0.0009006956,0.0004956626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008187306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001004411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003069671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003425706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990746,0.0002105166,0.00002884128,0.0001149753,0.0005194006,0.00005171329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995843,0.0002006498,0.00005362556,0.00004645201,0.00009636183,0.00001861799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001180784,0.0001800626,0.0004250657,0.001120446,0.00009128453,0.0001690538,0.0002226835,0.08904666,0.1494764,0.6427186,0.002525798,0.1139059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004489913,0.0003657757,0.0003334277,0.0001012107,0.00005580624,0.000375581,0.00004659834,0.8227416,0.06106911,0.08869568,0.02609573,0.00007456862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003896044,0.002129296,0.9899566,0.0002904348,0.0001106993,0.00004732852,0.00001413483,0.0001128036,0.003442602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3711275,0.008329,0.6100253,0.0005574665,0.0003867638,0.0005455222,0.00008956696,0.0001177944,0.008821015],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001671099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006001949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005301187527162085,"score_gpt":0.1972591541778298,"score_spread":0.1919579666506677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}