{"id":"W2169310428","doi":"10.1002/tea.20008","title":"Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Scientific writing; Professional writing; Science education; Science communication; Ambiguity; Perception; Scientific literacy; Technical writing; Science, technology, society and environment education; Sociology; Nature of Science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Higher education; Political science; Engineering; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02128862,0.0003681068,0.0004325397,0.005586729,0.008402674,0.01404382,0.001051747,0.00168402,0.001542214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06133306,0.0003459225,0.0003028665,0.002725006,0.01846869,0.003633816,0.003262772,0.00225114,0.0001945568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01288274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01422868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07474282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06466067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819666,0.0104089,0.0008467684,0.0006106325,0.005179211,0.0009878491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935364,0.04504715,0.008228431,0.001383914,0.007117752,0.002858795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005141182,0.00004757783,0.02120186,0.00006037941,0.00001156119,0.0001838698,0.9590606,0.0001970478,0.001233057,0.009815895,0.0002863198,0.007850406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002824772,0.0000744797,0.02574519,0.0001971026,0.00002522276,0.000227739,0.951056,0.000968572,0.0009446915,0.00907657,0.01160461,0.00005154563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789826,0.0004408609,0.0009639126,0.002038368,0.00001760227,0.0000213868,0.00001308791,0.000009961584,0.01751228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988224,0.0002009576,0.000170424,0.00006884637,0.000006342464,0.000008831028,0.000007046473,0.000002801156,0.0007124363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1486155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2310648360709079,"score_gpt":0.4966819380656629,"score_spread":0.265617101994755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}