{"id":"W2169350000","doi":"10.1139/x02-041","title":"Response of the natural abundance of<sup>15</sup>N in forest soils and foliage to high nitrate loss following clear-cutting","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Nitrification; Nitrate; Soil water; Clearcutting; Ammonium; Watershed; Ecosystem; Soil horizon; Environmental science; Nitrogen; Hydrology (agriculture); Experimental forest; Animal science; Organic matter; Podzol; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Agronomy; Soil science; Ecology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002303089,0.0001140157,0.0002289705,0.0003384323,0.0002146107,0.00005848977,0.000630427,0.00007186077,0.00003620672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007442379,0.0000854313,0.0001031832,0.000866,0.0004932374,0.0002593057,0.0001243623,0.000568766,0.00001171621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000353175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0158783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05009222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977987,0.0003400163,0.0004317873,0.0001764506,0.0006274486,0.0006255914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988574,0.000308331,0.0001181419,0.0002499746,0.00006407016,0.0004020938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001687641,0.00001697151,0.9882163,0.00001315329,0.00001104717,0.0002819847,0.001899831,0.007762386,0.0001678489,0.00008480412,0.0003568473,0.00102005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006432082,0.0002770471,0.9907106,0.0002793543,0.000005980464,0.00008058726,0.0004080234,0.003985418,0.0003798786,0.002673292,0.0004466587,0.0001099588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997698,0.0002229312,0.0000053388,0.001486049,0.00009858568,0.000177151,0.00001054495,0.000001447743,0.0002999278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994231,0.00002033483,0.000187948,0.00007186746,0.00003063835,0.000002539034,3.770851e-7,0.00001555217,0.0002476611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03421392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01900921977351897,"score_gpt":0.255751485398342,"score_spread":0.2367422656248231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}