{"id":"W2169380093","doi":"10.1017/s1355617711001573","title":"Construct Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Construct validity; Confirmatory factor analysis; Discriminant validity; Psychology; Construct (python library); Cognition; Reliability (semiconductor); Convergent validity; Cognitive psychology; Structural equation modeling; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Cognitive impairment; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01024609,0.0004699333,0.0007562638,0.003407833,0.0007220914,0.001136726,0.0008649783,0.0006105743,0.001384708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04272759,0.0002194454,0.001597474,0.001620372,0.001145851,0.0009954771,0.001874173,0.0007755536,0.000140493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003453098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01257175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01548629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945088,0.001691433,0.0005452595,0.0005338351,0.002453899,0.0002669134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826194,0.009184349,0.002722184,0.0008398862,0.003825391,0.0008088955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005678168,0.0004076953,0.8299605,0.0004811307,0.0009407352,0.0001148344,0.00217055,0.002080556,0.001175358,0.004949779,0.001882071,0.1552689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007767864,0.0005722509,0.9856957,0.0003131859,0.0002333098,0.00023129,0.0007523345,0.005395009,0.0005431417,0.002766457,0.003360455,0.000059204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710124,0.001976913,0.01070023,0.0006169801,0.0001396144,0.0009472653,0.001460133,0.0001155006,0.01303094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895282,0.0003669215,0.008437207,0.0000755568,0.00003527396,0.000511728,0.0006268365,0.00001306677,0.0004052003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01257175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05418712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0754655834838408,"score_gpt":0.3698436259162938,"score_spread":0.294378042432453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}