{"id":"W2169523438","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100461","title":"Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Publication; Best practice; Public relations; Health care; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Quality management; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1389102,0.0006500577,0.001056128,0.003892236,0.04299099,0.01411754,0.00500255,0.01528009,0.002624172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1897623,0.001151736,0.001307266,0.009328441,0.02113859,0.01064792,0.01371172,0.01405804,0.0004714558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04530424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0629634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04207207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0877765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7162324,0.2533027,0.004795792,0.003136061,0.01259735,0.009935729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6910939,0.2512939,0.01480692,0.007406474,0.01799875,0.01740006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001381001,0.001021447,0.008645564,0.001560048,0.00005732178,0.03872157,0.7118148,0.002049509,0.0007007951,0.1560042,0.02498038,0.05430618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001201037,0.0005073451,0.004288499,0.002198411,0.00006769106,0.009177714,0.6811244,0.002769473,0.001251707,0.0197389,0.2785961,0.0001597323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5131081,0.01356025,0.04280494,0.3307515,0.001985726,0.004218852,0.0001552521,0.000198704,0.09321664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935259,0.005740982,0.02758665,0.01913823,0.0004994532,0.001685738,0.00004929562,0.0001195678,0.009921061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7346363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4424215357047506,"score_gpt":0.6902163520874726,"score_spread":0.2477948163827219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}