{"id":"W2169602816","doi":"10.1016/s1057-5219(01)00059-x","title":"A contingent claim analysis of closed-end fund premia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Financial Analysis","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Washington; Washington State University","keywords":"Uncorrelated; Economics; Autocorrelation; Econometrics; Net asset value; Risk premium; Capital asset pricing model; Martingale (probability theory); Value (mathematics); Financial economics; Arbitrage; Replicate; Stochastic discount factor; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008082935,0.001168819,0.001710515,0.002888122,0.001198193,0.004177994,0.002296041,0.002758688,0.007876446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234774,0.000787377,0.001698634,0.001693282,0.003845999,0.01136717,0.002369113,0.004941512,0.0006405837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001241851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001368383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001128171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007726615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982956,0.0006978833,0.00009862397,0.0002656012,0.0003876475,0.0002546539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795077,0.01384065,0.002226357,0.001704689,0.001691905,0.00102864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005121337,0.00004976961,0.0009130088,0.00005703519,0.00004723128,0.0001589873,0.0001456281,0.008687993,0.0006964107,0.9794311,0.002150472,0.007611146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002246424,0.0000440428,0.00109167,0.00003499857,0.00005458028,0.0001565493,0.00004587848,0.1297919,0.0004166913,0.8662248,0.0020924,0.00002405573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.190233,0.006185375,0.7459742,0.008313851,0.0005722247,0.0001715535,0.0005748704,0.0004352318,0.04753957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468467,0.002568554,0.03023688,0.0002985746,0.001390388,0.00009912235,0.0002730302,0.0001268946,0.01815988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008082935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0427472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03716566561503466,"score_gpt":0.2766289163071404,"score_spread":0.2394632506921057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}