{"id":"W2169627913","doi":"10.1016/j.ffa.2006.09.004","title":"On the parity of the number of irreducible factors of self-reciprocal polynomials over finite fields","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Finite Fields and Their Applications","topic":"Coding theory and cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Monomial; Mathematics; Reciprocal; Parity (physics); Finite field; Polynomial; Pure mathematics; Irreducible polynomial; Binary number; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Arithmetic; Mathematical analysis; Matrix polynomial","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002003184,0.00009709912,0.0001492999,0.00003605821,0.0001322327,0.00001808184,0.0005279577,0.00009169179,0.00005384371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002706069,0.00005341357,0.0001298024,0.0003729964,0.0001118415,0.00004854493,0.0001374636,0.0001405081,0.000001439814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002657885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000262362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001281757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001771364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993284,0.00006165839,0.0002426801,0.0001649409,0.00009767791,0.0001046188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977707,0.00134121,0.0001710489,0.000648509,0.00004808457,0.00002047186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007134308,0.0001878088,0.006939673,0.00002037692,0.000028577,2.839854e-8,0.0008120844,0.00008673645,0.0002268451,0.9898241,0.0004504716,0.001416225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003333228,0.0001309447,0.06158879,0.00007076281,0.00003774897,0.000001606772,0.0001648395,0.00277968,0.03909043,0.8871645,0.008395975,0.0002413849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8129916,0.00006842693,0.1736612,0.0009478916,0.00008899298,0.0003484865,0.0000785616,0.00003467155,0.01178023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993934,0.00001262814,0.0003371263,0.000127317,0.00002615017,0.0000357321,0.000002410825,0.000003523124,0.00006170321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1864019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2178142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01233122792955884,"score_gpt":0.2302576990481771,"score_spread":0.2179264711186182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}