{"id":"W2169651209","doi":"10.1504/ijram.2007.014661","title":"Preferences, utility and risk perception in engineering decision making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Premise; Preference; Risk analysis (engineering); Reputation; Risk aversion (psychology); Perception; Prospect theory; Risk perception; Actuarial science; Ranking (information retrieval); Economics; Loss aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Financial economics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00153134,0.00008446229,0.0001739761,0.0006053446,0.00003800719,0.0001030806,0.0001219072,0.00003258266,0.00005967946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003505514,0.00008028145,0.0000621646,0.00009083396,0.00001843581,0.0002843034,0.00008765849,0.0001506571,0.000002923491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003420246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001091195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001347349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990686,0.00001076135,0.0005581297,0.0001496504,0.0001076284,0.0001052442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.00008723956,0.0004459847,0.00006044012,0.00004252702,0.0000410858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005208095,0.00006957298,0.8493953,0.000009621262,0.000195768,0.00001765744,0.0002443152,0.0002839931,0.00000190748,0.04336812,0.00006576688,0.1062959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061476,0.00003168333,0.9423723,0.00006503183,0.00003004085,0.000004813079,0.0002969738,0.01497649,0.000001111491,0.04000013,0.001524483,0.00008217666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288839,0.002130315,0.06748047,0.00006689075,0.000382402,0.00006710127,0.00001122472,0.000004154292,0.0009735986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314811,0.05177045,0.01662683,0.00002076568,0.00007616516,0.000001245849,0.000002348358,0.000004565013,0.00001658172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3273782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01801546157288185,"score_gpt":0.2830734664712049,"score_spread":0.265058004898323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}