{"id":"W2169659094","doi":"10.1109/icites.2012.6216681","title":"Evaluating the assessment method of the software maintenance maturity model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Capability Maturity Model; Computer science; Process (computing); Implementation; Software; Maturity (psychological); Software engineering; LeanCMMI; Software development process; Set (abstract data type); Evaluation methods; Reliability engineering; Software development; Systems engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002551849,0.00007929325,0.00008455931,0.00001389628,0.0001053477,0.00004536538,0.001031513,0.00003394676,0.00001063098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003502953,0.00003726109,0.0000640655,0.0001880436,0.00001936165,0.0004227624,0.0004650336,0.0001997169,0.000001895513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002698353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005262265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002840929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.150147e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990756,0.0001595884,0.0001442009,0.0001189861,0.000303808,0.0001978115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983323,0.000707563,0.0001170126,0.0007458277,0.00006843384,0.00002891087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005978861,0.0001611612,0.007931066,0.00008125861,0.00006067835,3.608687e-7,0.001942675,0.0689643,0.00239293,0.6796554,0.009804736,0.2289994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004346443,0.00002163063,0.006080539,0.00001717171,0.000009762517,0.00001299915,0.00001050727,0.9790578,0.002182951,0.01126167,0.001221586,0.00007993961],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001062423,0.00006836977,0.996191,0.001244561,0.0002332072,0.0001457713,0.000001176775,0.00022563,0.0008278802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2080485,0.000004660858,0.7913907,0.0002998487,0.00001828021,0.00001877938,1.015319e-7,0.000004350043,0.0002147817],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1916825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08092094637983056,"score_gpt":0.4140000343846742,"score_spread":0.3330790880048436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}