{"id":"W2169681737","doi":"","title":"Scientific Errors and Ambiguities in Prominent Submissions to Canadian Environmental Assessments: A Case Study of the Jackpine Mine Expansion Project","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"viXra","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allowance (engineering); Agency (philosophy); Uncertainty; Process (computing); Political science; Democracy; Citizen journalism; Work (physics); Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Operations research; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Engineering; Operations management; Social science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004154658,0.0003977362,0.0004052523,0.00022361,0.0004232816,0.0001438221,0.0004867666,0.0001773168,0.000596633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000316825,0.0003001032,0.00008128941,0.0003234459,0.0004445799,0.000218689,0.002337004,0.0004459592,0.00003632522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001448455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001449369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5792137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4212214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971634,0.0002584326,0.0005279164,0.0008022543,0.0007166572,0.000531332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865,0.00002488124,0.0002134798,0.0007299138,0.000005306594,0.0003763795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002031855,0.002074703,0.9380901,0.00007177871,0.00006823897,0.0003901182,0.03376861,0.001051951,0.01795545,0.000002620521,0.002508825,0.003997227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001061232,0.0005577255,0.9397132,0.0002173466,0.00009082557,0.00009098073,0.05506683,0.0007235917,0.0006449121,0.00010237,0.001052353,0.0006786744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946878,0.00003100978,0.000001549084,0.0003024562,0.0004507916,0.003902199,0.0001321015,0.00001130957,0.0004808173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997188,0.00001475505,0.000220883,0.000120326,0.00002440399,0.0004324027,0.00003122643,0.00003501654,0.00193304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1579923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03460112238607471,"score_gpt":0.3144283139509873,"score_spread":0.2798271915649126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}