{"id":"W2169811924","doi":"10.1111/stan.12014","title":"Comment on ‘Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments’","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistica Neerlandica","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Type I and type II errors; Factorial; Factorial experiment; Rank (graph theory); Mathematics; Transformation (genetics); Statistics; Fractional factorial design; Type (biology); Test (biology); Power (physics); Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001289455,0.000188582,0.0003764838,0.00007842977,0.00004993741,0.00002251913,0.00006375965,0.00005968349,0.00004981152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01105994,0.0001454096,0.0000224197,0.0000688253,0.00005887605,0.00005661956,0.00003775205,0.000138393,0.000003259849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005857139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001302098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003290961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004475279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00007993503,0.0003796705,0.0002454815,0.000173917,0.0002538799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787939,0.02070508,0.0001498576,0.0001552571,0.00008606731,0.0001098249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001009962,0.003724717,0.01313575,0.001899387,0.0001539559,0.00002630056,0.004536996,0.00001555127,0.06175821,0.8405653,0.02002828,0.05314561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003065794,0.004444246,0.01848616,0.0004823673,0.00005678849,0.000003221033,0.0002395842,0.009227429,0.005055295,0.9581772,0.0003746242,0.0003873095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.179484,0.00002619028,0.8170098,0.0003036225,0.0006743711,0.001899767,0.0002257125,0.00004811982,0.0003284283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6800249,0.000001928005,0.3196529,0.00009141623,0.00003648526,0.0001438862,0.00001071822,0.00002122079,0.00001648695],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.500541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1240962817277446,"score_gpt":0.4345074746872428,"score_spread":0.3104111929594983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}