{"id":"W2169877991","doi":"10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00919.x","title":"Predator Inspection Behaviour in a Characin Fish: an Interaction between Chemical and Visual Information?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethology","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Predator; Predation; ALARM; Biology; Sensory cue; Xiphophorus; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Cichlid; Chemical communication; Zoology; Ecology; Communication; Fishery; Psychology; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002093301,0.00006665254,0.00009400045,0.00002237275,0.00006392586,0.00002264184,0.00003172774,0.0001341798,0.00007228855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004865501,0.00003133027,0.00001666646,0.0001252928,0.00004419677,0.0004842335,0.00001544379,0.0001665914,0.00001031626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002278468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000310201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009895071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001164531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994042,0.00009772415,0.0001600317,0.0001679764,0.00005531069,0.0001147623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998388,0.00002426131,0.00005064352,0.00002213079,0.00002185273,0.00004226258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003142172,0.00008113759,0.8129244,0.000002080142,0.000001449749,0.000001382774,0.0003295902,2.171467e-7,0.1592285,0.00008766473,0.00003884831,0.02727327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001009138,0.0002517618,0.9843302,0.000002646709,0.000005997938,0.00005387596,0.0006914341,0.000005597517,0.01326868,0.00006735084,0.001144863,0.00007664968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991484,0.000004825649,0.000005600354,0.0004060761,0.0001244969,0.0001067104,0.000006674538,0.00005176212,0.0001454802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996479,0.000005933798,0.00004543943,0.00005632097,0.0001172179,0.00001268785,0.00009396902,4.467221e-7,0.00002004902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1714058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1277611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02528122209937009,"score_gpt":0.2965863035600368,"score_spread":0.2713050814606667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}