{"id":"W2169982830","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1060.0241","title":"Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":765,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Misconduct; Incentive; Executive compensation; Accountability; Business; Accounting; Compensation (psychology); Sample (material); Financial statement; Appearance of impropriety; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Microeconomics; Audit; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008624052,0.0002379938,0.0003542916,0.001182034,0.001091259,0.003557267,0.0006333032,0.001574935,0.005109313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08562026,0.000202078,0.0003700175,0.000948827,0.001966711,0.001528792,0.001708224,0.00211828,0.0006258421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001344912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001416892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004312681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930311,0.004504205,0.0003361356,0.0003732538,0.0008206228,0.0009348607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7516373,0.1492556,0.07693917,0.005794122,0.005273959,0.01109968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002255636,0.0006958158,0.989343,0.000007715035,0.00006369599,0.0001208463,0.0004999185,0.0006601273,0.0001771702,0.001156528,0.000307553,0.006741902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001909511,0.0002043821,0.9921756,0.00002016944,0.00006280907,0.0001176774,0.001335513,0.003193784,0.0002661156,0.002222462,0.0003639413,0.00001850984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957979,0.0001037755,0.0001341631,0.0008289712,0.000006687621,0.000008532073,0.00002141966,0.000003167346,0.003095473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996392,0.00002593664,0.00003225035,0.00005169571,0.00001070379,0.000002505355,0.00001201006,0.000001489635,0.0002243123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008624052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04560888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007151296843150893,"score_gpt":0.2251186837897499,"score_spread":0.217967386946599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}