{"id":"W2170164498","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00707.x","title":"A spatially explicit method for evaluating accuracy of species distribution models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Categorical variable; Ursus; Spatial analysis; Probabilistic logic; Statistics; Species distribution; Statistical model; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Computer science; Cartography; Mathematics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00704845,0.0007200711,0.0005535919,0.002210328,0.0004048684,0.001209996,0.001095078,0.0007162081,0.00137822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0412179,0.0003247336,0.0007315431,0.00116789,0.0006132185,0.001134392,0.001244542,0.000761241,0.0001665902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009345484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009042515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008932145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01095477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973454,0.001374575,0.0002772846,0.0003907249,0.000532311,0.00007977901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698354,0.0220741,0.002894261,0.002863363,0.002146357,0.0001865038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004192379,0.0001664238,0.08390481,0.0001498443,0.0004873753,0.0001948586,0.0002794036,0.7786942,0.006498797,0.008659346,0.0008150963,0.1197306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001692559,0.00009393123,0.007836477,0.00001862082,0.00002743997,0.00004982811,0.0000345165,0.9872754,0.002306032,0.001870916,0.0004451418,0.00002466985],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3128026,0.0001623951,0.6819076,0.0001041878,0.00002981972,0.0001343231,0.0008543184,0.001957343,0.002047335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8300912,0.00003637608,0.1687946,0.00002007097,0.00001126617,0.0001408788,0.0004727252,0.00006942765,0.0003634889],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008932145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03727615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05431677426763783,"score_gpt":0.292541663399017,"score_spread":0.2382248891313792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}