{"id":"W2170389382","doi":"10.1139/z99-219","title":"Relative use of contiguous and fragmented boreal forest by red squirrels (<i>Tamiasciurus hudsonicus</i>)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Elsemay Björn Rahasto; Australian Government","keywords":"Taiga; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Biological dispersal; Relative species abundance; Biology; Old-growth forest; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001441873,0.0001051974,0.0002774202,0.00005409251,0.0001350486,0.000007535396,0.0001241519,0.0001344831,0.001924689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006926908,0.00009176094,0.00005220571,0.00009190383,0.0009464811,0.0002122981,0.00001908936,0.0002177133,0.00001940281],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001064377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006828194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01469917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1332515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991176,0.00008210833,0.0003119533,0.0001301974,0.00007472603,0.0002834041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993556,0.00008730751,0.0001778558,0.00007950575,0.00002298743,0.0002767215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006874261,0.00002236914,0.9831645,0.000001281317,0.00004007947,0.0001666075,0.000358639,0.00003418872,0.0003345824,0.00005807367,0.01153028,0.004220587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005124764,0.0006043757,0.98497,0.0000101597,0.00005846908,0.0002035514,0.00008886717,0.00001266946,0.00007069622,0.0002472673,0.01313307,0.00008838171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955724,0.0003621228,0.0000215194,0.0006315952,0.00009118138,0.00007619994,0.0000303392,0.000002351892,0.003212264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982926,0.000127114,0.0002428487,0.0002650758,0.00001277204,0.000001461127,0.000002478905,0.000006961028,0.001048737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1185523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01153854171482306,"score_gpt":0.208341872402036,"score_spread":0.1968033306872129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}