{"id":"W2170463008","doi":"10.1139/x06-241","title":"Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences gained from western Finland","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Preference; Ranking (information retrieval); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Management science; Strategic planning; Operations research; Business; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003416853,0.0001135689,0.0002869086,0.0007957218,0.0001329188,0.00009429872,0.0003221662,0.00004939767,0.001287472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002827323,0.00009925668,0.000071138,0.000888102,0.00062194,0.0004307415,0.0001001612,0.000356329,0.000005936132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000203033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001207533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1804267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7086117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979104,0.0004047836,0.0005382235,0.0002003623,0.0003777557,0.0005684547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980546,0.001018309,0.0001952033,0.0001642229,0.00004708461,0.0005205667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009129476,0.00002156951,0.9870974,0.000006402664,0.0000859834,0.0001553101,0.008922384,0.002399309,0.00002929301,0.00004763695,0.0002753567,0.0008680802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002908,0.0001488041,0.9859243,0.00004261078,0.00003682116,0.000002777804,0.00540218,0.006567179,0.00006901087,0.0004127088,0.001015506,0.00008730825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984002,0.00009326528,0.0004717059,0.0001124506,0.00004671079,0.0001282643,0.00001294988,0.000001257525,0.0007331739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984832,0.000003671873,0.001326751,0.00003190333,0.00004513836,0.000003096423,0.000007041853,0.000006791521,0.00009243442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.528185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2737960748903733,"score_gpt":0.4634822270768837,"score_spread":0.1896861521865104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}