{"id":"W2170580565","doi":"10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37","title":"UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OPTION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Action Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":844,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Participatory action research; Action research; Focus group; Citizen journalism; Action (physics); Feeling; Data collection; Participant observation; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Management science; Pedagogy; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2227929,0.001175491,0.001464098,0.003081229,0.00662539,0.01428171,0.004665705,0.007718165,0.0107156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1572116,0.001207818,0.001444884,0.004236865,0.01444257,0.0152253,0.01061453,0.005809209,0.002058033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007528253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02526448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001731947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00207781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7728357,0.2038508,0.005500237,0.004064506,0.01165953,0.002089256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8028246,0.1634216,0.00470703,0.01247243,0.01379042,0.002784055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001003538,0.0001744162,0.0005905463,0.004118104,0.00004886666,0.0003147396,0.1562079,0.001126181,0.001265394,0.7072106,0.014595,0.114248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001991445,0.0002103388,0.0002736878,0.006241717,0.00004630406,0.0003750513,0.06950712,0.002743164,0.001394789,0.4426956,0.4762199,0.00009316767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007259722,0.00182487,0.8675106,0.05645556,0.001325847,0.01803421,0.000722415,0.0003471756,0.04651963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07625708,0.001669125,0.8787481,0.005901061,0.0001947725,0.03141466,0.000223805,0.0001321917,0.005459299],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2227929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9584348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9985137278836035,"score_gpt":0.861499388724144,"score_spread":0.1370143391594595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}