{"id":"W2170580565","doi":"10.33524/cjar.v13i2.37","title":"UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OPTION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Action Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":844,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Participatory action research; Action research; Focus group; Citizen journalism; Action (physics); Feeling; Data collection; Participant observation; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Management science; Pedagogy; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4922952,0.0001430624,0.0003360288,0.003587313,0.009886754,0.000583173,0.001155269,0.0003657776,0.0009934854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08032236,0.0001156522,0.000147026,0.00451027,0.007652576,0.001503849,0.0001192015,0.00591821,0.0003128205],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01091103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01319986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1214286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3672787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7997875,0.1898037,0.000659877,0.0002815138,0.005859042,0.003608368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955491,0.03477106,0.0002407907,0.0004979651,0.005772428,0.003226739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005255555,0.0001394969,0.002499483,0.00004917025,0.0001636943,0.00005036038,0.5062686,0.00005117957,0.007343472,0.4424549,0.03249302,0.007961173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003320168,0.0005277082,0.002950659,0.0000913916,0.00001623072,0.00002367346,0.7173734,0.00007997412,0.003313118,0.09938169,0.1757566,0.0001535863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9207206,0.001570833,0.009739397,0.03580552,0.002503906,0.001453646,0.00001119256,0.00003408919,0.02816078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944614,0.0003094598,0.0009938125,0.000046269,0.002069154,0.00007792124,8.916871e-7,0.00003467569,0.002006475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4119728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9985137278836035,"score_gpt":0.861499388724144,"score_spread":0.1370143391594595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}