{"id":"W2170606321","doi":"10.1139/f09-069","title":"Behavioural toxicity of organic chemical contaminants in fish: application to ecological risk assessments (ERAs)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lethality; Environmental science; Pollutant; Risk assessment; Hazard; Environmental hazard; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Contamination; Ecology; Toxicology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health; Biology; Fishery; Business; Medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005692143,0.00008555488,0.0002064584,0.00007734021,0.0001550835,0.00002601597,0.0002651859,0.00008516559,0.0006771039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001453801,0.00007047323,0.00002700647,0.0002903402,0.0006215707,0.0002064395,0.00002656154,0.0001398842,0.000006061579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001581914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007108152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007658515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04802429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990417,0.00006241524,0.0003292108,0.0001659589,0.0001423562,0.0002583902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993812,0.00007454577,0.0001889913,0.0000652805,0.000003206861,0.0002867314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000981407,0.00006129123,0.9787008,7.428463e-7,0.00000205545,0.00001240425,0.0002211698,0.00003002877,0.01321208,0.00001292831,0.0002754645,0.007461184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002294285,0.0009733681,0.9912273,0.000009205214,0.000009410095,0.00003776458,0.0003235707,0.0002313592,0.005830391,0.0008704295,0.0001708498,0.00008695121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977853,0.0000128919,0.0001159796,0.001151855,0.00006457571,0.0001179386,0.000003426286,0.000001238041,0.0007467681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980791,0.00001728662,0.001120994,0.0007319105,0.00001025087,0.000002389461,5.040177e-7,0.000001907461,0.00003571604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04725844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01600291565987613,"score_gpt":0.244704307342208,"score_spread":0.2287013916823319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}