{"id":"W2170650652","doi":"10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00276-7","title":"Assessing the environmental fate of chemicals of emerging concern: a case study of the polybrominated diphenyl ethers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet","keywords":"Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Polybrominated Biphenyls; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Business; Pollutant; Engineering; Organic chemistry; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003438436,0.000253856,0.0003151753,0.0000343215,0.0002205035,0.0000116686,0.0004529488,0.00009426122,0.00313494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003392953,0.000170616,0.0001437501,0.0002421157,0.00123634,0.0003278127,0.0004358416,0.000229869,0.00003159111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004494856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004699153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005061809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002562748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976578,0.0002962599,0.0006491886,0.0003339656,0.0007230768,0.0003397236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985393,0.00007274427,0.0006472934,0.0006574889,3.791535e-7,0.0000828272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001254167,0.0008725446,0.0502625,0.000003889138,0.00006455427,0.00001948653,0.007205573,0.0004772373,0.9193838,6.315215e-7,0.00003392515,0.02166328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00150508,0.0002828366,0.6239635,0.00003229619,0.0001722965,0.0003733882,0.02740801,0.002510336,0.3433917,0.00001990749,0.00005900854,0.0002816509],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984612,0.0001711441,0.00001910776,0.0001706506,0.0001047985,0.0005783841,0.0001281666,0.0000127431,0.0003537865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996987,0.0000242757,0.00003829407,0.00005116905,0.00001871348,0.000005665587,9.205456e-7,0.00003144672,0.0001307999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5759922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0213644003141886,"score_gpt":0.2613441136906606,"score_spread":0.239979713376472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}