{"id":"W2170650652","doi":"10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00276-7","title":"Assessing the environmental fate of chemicals of emerging concern: a case study of the polybrominated diphenyl ethers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet","keywords":"Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Polybrominated Biphenyls; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Chemistry; Business; Pollutant; Engineering; Organic chemistry; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001748458,0.000664214,0.000441384,0.0007066989,0.001528162,0.001519121,0.0008560161,0.002452229,0.001342488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002551696,0.0003176405,0.0006001384,0.0009689064,0.0004831188,0.001381347,0.0006943174,0.0007321736,0.0002478817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009821043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01577505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03602602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992181,0.0002870063,0.00003034213,0.00006363766,0.0003167426,0.00008411643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987406,0.0006930967,0.0001434678,0.00007190248,0.0002957359,0.00005520841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003314426,0.006962327,0.2179906,0.001852458,0.0005708907,0.05156797,0.0109576,0.1633916,0.2321827,0.007583596,0.002450872,0.3011751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005807086,0.01391512,0.1262305,0.0001805589,0.001459674,0.01756972,0.04364995,0.2182696,0.531404,0.008859495,0.03756348,0.000317129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946372,0.0001295676,0.002221505,0.0001439598,0.000003930678,0.00007585216,0.00007062954,0.00001197591,0.002705429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846045,0.0007211297,0.01118909,0.00004605216,0.000005787056,0.00002354098,0.00009240473,0.00001193015,0.003305651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01577505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03136647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0213644003141886,"score_gpt":0.2613441136906606,"score_spread":0.239979713376472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}