{"id":"W2170761208","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2010.0095","title":"Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":388,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Research Foundation; Fondazione Edmund Mach","keywords":"Foraging; Ecology; Habitat; Population; Herbivore; Movement (music); Predation; Optimal foraging theory; Geography; Animal ecology; Home range; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001264267,0.0001140556,0.0001596515,0.000006904312,0.0007794945,0.000009166793,0.0008518737,0.0001953273,0.002055594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007869766,0.00005288515,0.0003224474,0.0003207886,0.005177812,0.00006878551,0.00009793865,0.00045352,0.000009545683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002465926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002019405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001571985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009190226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987584,0.0001931267,0.0002851369,0.0002580325,0.0002577911,0.0002474877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990854,0.0004833858,0.0001477423,0.0002179824,0.00001584709,0.00004962473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002369704,0.000240404,0.9781822,0.000003835209,0.00002743493,1.526299e-7,0.0002405444,0.001985925,0.003294365,0.01411666,0.00006955623,0.001815232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001289552,0.0001816789,0.8073385,0.000003845787,0.00002975153,0.000001670472,0.0001681935,0.002081968,0.001232614,0.1887053,0.00004216854,0.00008540008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756643,0.00001327564,0.00155072,0.02108258,0.0003096503,0.0002227737,0.000008572323,0.00001816183,0.001130017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975328,0.000007119697,0.0009331724,0.001387082,0.00003682756,0.00002868184,5.541532e-7,0.000002618552,0.00007116472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1745887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02900965402437785,"score_gpt":0.2437151716163061,"score_spread":0.2147055175919282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}