{"id":"W2170778218","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2009)14:11(1197)","title":"Current Status of Radioactive Waste Management in Korea","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrologic Engineering","topic":"Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute","keywords":"Radioactive waste; Nuclear power; Spent nuclear fuel; Waste management; Interim; Environmental science; Nuclear fuel; Business; Nuclear engineering; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003378937,0.0008163759,0.0007002632,0.003145477,0.0006648632,0.003932653,0.002498208,0.001621414,0.006467025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00236763,0.0004861912,0.0006952792,0.004696352,0.001752653,0.00524468,0.001838356,0.001170235,0.001689225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002327982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009091354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003262782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985099,0.0002344102,0.0002934607,0.0003033817,0.000419813,0.0002390095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957926,0.0008226531,0.001169584,0.0001596084,0.001632373,0.0004231168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003075706,0.0002440457,0.007822989,0.01434092,0.00009910473,0.0003454605,0.0003755747,0.00148721,0.003977671,0.01683634,0.02686042,0.9273027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005067917,0.0004879375,0.009337231,0.005839494,0.0002202619,0.001419798,0.00277403,0.001185537,0.007587963,0.008935766,0.9620337,0.0001275319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01318591,0.95198,0.002928673,0.01379123,0.0007480343,0.00007596188,0.0004463829,0.0002041364,0.01663961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07419726,0.9112878,0.00466466,0.00420594,0.0006199427,0.00009722909,0.001099242,0.00005849486,0.003769345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006467025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02163434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01008379131338939,"score_gpt":0.2413106482900674,"score_spread":0.231226856976678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}