{"id":"W2170853760","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006","title":"Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Development","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1090,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Danish International Development Agency; Centre for International Forestry Research; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Economic and Social Research Council; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Livelihood; Rural development; Geography; Economics; Development economics; Natural resource economics; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006519774,0.0002327585,0.0002308742,0.002775637,0.0003453928,0.0005369408,0.0001527615,0.0001368358,0.003917586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001087145,0.00007661846,0.0003245939,0.006719994,0.0003627381,0.0008761674,0.0008511372,0.0002048463,0.0001938836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003707353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001736325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006310955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01470503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996537,0.0001609501,0.00001175074,0.00004425401,0.0000474298,0.00008188227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994809,0.0001933741,0.0001258585,0.00003390116,0.0001051352,0.00006094444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002626144,0.00007288513,0.9627705,0.0001983566,0.0002803451,0.0003219387,0.001642231,0.001052983,0.0004821883,0.002671628,0.001040473,0.02920381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004161766,0.00009023758,0.9946425,0.00002904285,0.00005360731,0.0001730505,0.002160035,0.00018674,0.00009337751,0.0002515695,0.002310064,0.000005522432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910556,0.0013359,0.0001653837,0.0001136347,0.000003961516,0.000006845682,0.001611885,0.000003132114,0.005703557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975768,0.0007240024,0.0001375434,0.00001213493,0.000005915247,0.000007372759,0.001239063,0.000002922858,0.0002942444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006310955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01310557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008103160112385979,"score_gpt":0.2006234124696792,"score_spread":0.1925202523572932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}