{"id":"W2170886075","doi":"10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00089-x","title":"An inverse oblique effect in human vision","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vision Research","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Eye Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; University of Chicago","keywords":"Oblique case; Optics; Filter (signal processing); Orientation (vector space); Inverse; Pooling; Psychophysics; Physics; Contrast (vision); Mathematics; Geometry; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Computer vision; Psychology; Neuroscience; Perception","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003740412,0.0002966651,0.0003401164,0.0003094973,0.0003264071,0.000972347,0.0002777313,0.0007439867,0.006751926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003055673,0.0002709492,0.000279489,0.0003875735,0.001099377,0.001987683,0.0008865745,0.0008815567,0.0004786389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001324858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000189904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004524105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002803815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999835,0.00003691238,0.00001018174,0.00004082797,0.00005031245,0.0000267544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990631,0.0005421067,0.0000610156,0.0001935002,0.00008747128,0.00005294604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001587108,0.0001039762,0.002877582,0.0005638993,0.00006047852,0.001341346,0.0007857825,0.003076449,0.3637048,0.4875026,0.003332398,0.1350635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002650878,0.0005889973,0.04629551,0.0001662087,0.0002211487,0.006970075,0.0006820499,0.03511885,0.1122516,0.7712077,0.02609026,0.0001425288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6617218,0.008477909,0.2395733,0.002764571,0.0007548704,0.00006419924,0.0002986537,0.0005189247,0.08582572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722852,0.002214245,0.01926497,0.0002542662,0.0001683114,0.00001495228,0.00008487685,0.00009160151,0.005621589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006751926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02258742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1650720211837663,"score_gpt":0.5279560582987927,"score_spread":0.3628840371150264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}