{"id":"W2170932282","doi":"10.1144/gsl.sp.2001.185.01.03","title":"Regional till geochemical surveys in the Canadian Cordillera: sample media, methods and anomaly evaluation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geological Society London Special Publications","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anomaly (physics); Sample (material); Geology; Physical geography; Regional science; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006335069,0.0001715103,0.0002065679,0.00006237193,0.0005874008,0.0002599165,0.001003917,0.0002966217,0.001020951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00293842,0.0001293737,0.0001198919,0.001222556,0.0003453538,0.0002797192,0.0002112221,0.0004408376,0.00001617336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001654018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003341176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01303006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04922469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969963,0.00108628,0.0003336217,0.0005880512,0.0004697015,0.0005259815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970816,0.001589911,0.0001042435,0.0005430876,0.0004501937,0.0002309511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009966067,0.000694407,0.252326,0.00001818826,0.00009681724,0.00001478005,0.006923939,0.0003650846,0.0006037143,0.3905134,0.1206288,0.2278049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003378001,0.00002087233,0.6292425,0.000002979052,0.00001009319,0.00004781934,0.0002020839,0.01772107,0.00001949412,0.06921417,0.2829759,0.0002052668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1371767,0.000678057,0.2011186,0.4809102,0.0004919203,0.001619703,0.00004497162,0.0002926079,0.1776672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381368,0.0001402345,0.05632883,0.003689349,0.0009007978,0.0002320082,0.0002881128,0.0000033764,0.000280448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8009601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07399367387355503,"score_gpt":0.3203212531840625,"score_spread":0.2463275793105074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}