{"id":"W2170932282","doi":"10.1144/gsl.sp.2001.185.01.03","title":"Regional till geochemical surveys in the Canadian Cordillera: sample media, methods and anomaly evaluation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geological Society London Special Publications","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anomaly (physics); Sample (material); Geology; Physical geography; Regional science; Geography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002648477,0.0005980817,0.0002538839,0.00457853,0.001348756,0.0009133061,0.0007958243,0.0002772266,0.001777203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003797716,0.0002396275,0.0001815053,0.003184566,0.0003907782,0.0002801111,0.0006588101,0.0001293055,0.0002921907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007099486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005185433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8597959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.931073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980921,0.0002441239,0.0001186483,0.0003459193,0.0009691471,0.0002300559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958137,0.0003028517,0.000274557,0.0001561613,0.00327165,0.0001810731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007704369,0.00009646419,0.7941939,0.0002033943,0.0001230495,0.0002054623,0.001038928,0.00264362,0.02774164,0.0004315133,0.001439142,0.1711124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223968,0.0002240459,0.9678905,0.00002889252,0.0001042752,0.0001461868,0.0009443351,0.007001298,0.01693038,0.00005084814,0.006608013,0.00003904459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791889,0.0008350286,0.008843946,0.00005934454,0.00001006046,0.0009612031,0.004707323,0.0003218628,0.005072448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520141,0.0004675491,0.03895414,0.00003241413,0.00001091049,0.0004631885,0.003816487,0.00004417209,0.004197008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1402041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2820596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07399367387355503,"score_gpt":0.3203212531840625,"score_spread":0.2463275793105074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}