{"id":"W2170961421","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0429","title":"Operational biomass recovery of small trees: equations for six central Ontario tree species","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Biomass Utilization and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute; Natural Resources Canada; University of Toronto; Laurentian University; FPInnovations","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Range (aeronautics); Diameter at breast height; Forest inventory; Tree allometry; Forestry; Tree (set theory); TOPS; Agroforestry; Ecology; Mathematics; Geography; Forest management; Biology; Biomass partitioning; Azimuth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007251416,0.00009366059,0.0001653739,0.0007616364,0.0001346495,0.00009731902,0.0002943598,0.00006374091,0.0003021231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003711426,0.00008923133,0.00011071,0.0002838479,0.000122138,0.0001464116,0.00001139884,0.0001603064,0.000006971661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005605569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009746678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01449985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998756,0.00004688716,0.0003804581,0.00008861718,0.0002944336,0.0004336076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998719,0.000193931,0.00005318797,0.0001517128,0.0004676332,0.0004145324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001428757,0.0001150323,0.371743,0.0004319,0.0005301909,0.0000460484,0.002510508,0.1583942,0.002381393,0.3220913,0.1274162,0.01419735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319773,0.0006823224,0.5314459,0.0001446977,0.00002957305,0.00001163596,0.0003079367,0.01759495,0.001426413,0.004075083,0.4427294,0.0002323351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8200105,0.0002796447,0.137521,0.00125387,0.001215097,0.0006522922,0.0001067547,0.00001969558,0.03894113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949777,0.00001303092,0.001746791,0.00002082623,0.000191802,0.000010045,0.00004178986,0.0000196398,0.00297842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06571027857733915,"score_gpt":0.2665831432427381,"score_spread":0.200872864665399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}