{"id":"W2170985466","doi":"10.1655/0733-1347(2007)20[83:psarco]2.0.co;2","title":"POPULATION SIZE AND RECOVERY CRITERIA OF THE THREATENED LAKE ERIE WATERSNAKE: INTEGRATING MULTIPLE METHODS OF POPULATION ESTIMATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Herpetological Monographs","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Endangered species; Mark and recapture; Population size; Statistics; Population; Point estimation; Range (aeronautics); Estimation; Vital rates; Biology; Population viability analysis; Confidence interval; Sample size determination; Ecology; Demography; Geography; Mathematics; Population growth; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003868805,0.0003465936,0.0004499773,0.002298443,0.0002838087,0.0005143858,0.0008260703,0.0003146983,0.0004591962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009967917,0.0002251397,0.0003690295,0.0005742821,0.0005076407,0.0007557404,0.0009202513,0.0003684797,0.0001439507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003381983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003622797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007529389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987454,0.0005442402,0.0001948746,0.0001565832,0.0002760568,0.00008272849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962251,0.001894873,0.000742749,0.0002374915,0.0007616968,0.0001380433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000358688,0.0001036736,0.9020285,0.0000493971,0.0001066765,0.0002476681,0.0009362598,0.01402903,0.00550481,0.0007483532,0.0003392697,0.07554764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004526482,0.0005114024,0.8232839,0.00004646406,0.0001030361,0.000878512,0.001011138,0.1686442,0.003317628,0.001011566,0.001074673,0.00007213287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748631,0.0001420621,0.02345404,0.00004195721,0.000003568805,0.00008887527,0.0001324393,0.00004076273,0.001233295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814217,0.0000414421,0.01782094,0.000009001775,0.000006674034,0.00009482899,0.0003427308,0.000007841438,0.000254759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003868805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02046043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01136584795912005,"score_gpt":0.2652129238734109,"score_spread":0.2538470759142909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}