{"id":"W2171105182","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.005","title":"A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Forest management; Monetization; Sustainable forest management; Stakeholder; Context (archaeology); Social preferences; Preference; Market value; Environmental resource management; Economics; Environmental economics; Geography; Microeconomics; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281899,0.0002279231,0.0005458167,0.0006573049,0.003354432,0.002410693,0.001347176,0.001022459,0.00558514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365432,0.0003590577,0.0006150329,0.001726588,0.002217185,0.001358285,0.001033588,0.001047226,0.000136943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04741525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01538548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992311,0.0002526253,0.00002328528,0.0000782348,0.0001118578,0.0003029321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997014,0.001636424,0.0003454862,0.0000913864,0.0003860456,0.0005266534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001193185,0.0006915853,0.5616057,0.0002176304,0.0005242766,0.00222964,0.01289694,0.1890288,0.001197202,0.1916702,0.00768659,0.03105827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002732933,0.0002215148,0.57735,0.0001458977,0.000357381,0.0003086732,0.03476658,0.3046887,0.0005806588,0.06513576,0.01602312,0.0001484294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919355,0.000180926,0.0008280894,0.001263495,0.000004280351,0.00003238779,0.0002453551,0.000004725953,0.00550521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953425,0.000178558,0.0004679031,0.000034467,0.000004907593,0.00001450786,0.0001089735,0.000004803492,0.003843433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04741525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3440233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05216666277611207,"score_gpt":0.2333839867312039,"score_spread":0.1812173239550919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}