{"id":"W2171105182","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.005","title":"A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Forest management; Monetization; Sustainable forest management; Stakeholder; Context (archaeology); Social preferences; Preference; Market value; Environmental resource management; Economics; Environmental economics; Geography; Microeconomics; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003939747,0.0002206389,0.0005956168,0.001018902,0.0001462241,0.0000873911,0.0002476029,0.0001292068,0.00001914825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001550053,0.0002904309,0.0001522502,0.0003417702,0.000091124,0.0006166055,0.0001625895,0.0001014265,0.00003596153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004087413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2453866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5717088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998184,0.00000996191,0.0007525024,0.0005551419,0.00002304081,0.000475348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992061,0.00002758186,0.0003061418,0.0003109331,0.000008734534,0.0001404827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001661308,0.0001300745,0.5391983,0.00002255667,0.0001199761,4.63946e-7,0.002736572,0.2408469,6.514656e-8,0.2168753,0.00000315626,0.00005001503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001243662,0.00008102583,0.9343343,0.000004167909,0.00006140729,8.424292e-7,0.0009639248,0.01553962,0.000001119765,0.04614025,0.001349927,0.0002796986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881043,0.00003292231,0.001056225,0.0001182694,0.00003308462,0.000427267,0.00008792597,0.00001325693,0.01012677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973828,0.00006055438,0.0008925609,0.0002337999,0.0001001079,0.00008062172,0.0002414468,0.00002928543,0.0009788662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3951361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05216666277611207,"score_gpt":0.2333839867312039,"score_spread":0.1812173239550919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}