{"id":"W2171212133","doi":"10.1603/ec13049","title":"Evaluation of Inflorescence Visitors as Pollinators of <I>Echinacea angustifolia</I> (Asteraceae): Comparison of Techniques","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Entomology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Biology; Pollinator; Pollen; Inflorescence; Botany; Pollination; Proboscis; Asteraceae; Hymenoptera; Horticulture; Zoology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009374306,0.0001251003,0.0005679755,0.00007119009,0.00004220363,0.000009365512,0.0002960446,0.0001186379,0.0004236922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001340001,0.00005812969,0.0001574772,0.00009221042,0.0001507426,0.0001865297,0.00007278097,0.000105232,0.00001105164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007017884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003875118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001774494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003972523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984417,0.0001635904,0.0008748376,0.000123748,0.0002283769,0.0001677735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979129,0.0002218979,0.001362123,0.00003444402,0.0004077954,0.00006085865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009271196,0.0001732669,0.1308287,0.00001733365,0.0001152916,0.000001345721,0.0002922539,0.0000554998,0.843778,0.001167748,0.00113714,0.02234073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004335137,0.002620383,0.7580429,0.0001486012,0.0001739782,0.00006284874,0.0005205579,0.0005655136,0.2307582,0.00478234,0.001687919,0.0002032807],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969691,0.001111887,0.000001858407,0.0002481522,0.0001718402,0.0001587691,0.00001676332,0.000005591125,0.001316036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994391,0.0001891514,0.0001645484,0.00001352591,0.0001505759,0.000003142748,0.000002410661,0.000001089257,0.00003642041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6272142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4639132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03885462721471656,"score_gpt":0.2871965751999516,"score_spread":0.2483419479852351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}