{"id":"W2171223742","doi":"10.1007/s10530-012-0392-9","title":"Meeting the challenge of quantitative risk assessment for genetic control techniques: a framework and some methods applied to the common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Invasions","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Minnesota Sea Grant, University of Minnesota; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Risk assessment; Context (archaeology); Biology; Risk analysis (engineering); Inference; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Environmental resource management; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009422444,0.000106914,0.0002170064,0.00001824841,0.0002556566,0.00001041141,0.0002416361,0.0001046549,0.0001037616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003933387,0.00005116923,0.00003836104,0.0001018673,0.000364934,0.0000262809,0.0003631416,0.000190631,0.00001297123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003336905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002248079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006362851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001101709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989218,0.0003486642,0.0002225691,0.0002374298,0.00005915159,0.0002104107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977013,0.001971665,0.0001005514,0.0001851529,0.000007907562,0.00003341299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118601,0.0007574311,0.7688593,0.00004814566,0.0002973373,0.000003310132,0.005146391,0.001675981,0.009062373,0.1752995,0.01105429,0.02767731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001434988,0.0003632293,0.9098973,0.00001249666,0.0000275074,1.838533e-7,0.001117668,0.0001834027,0.0001463465,0.08666349,0.001353692,0.00009119261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521028,0.0001260014,0.02974593,0.01142704,0.00007622893,0.004156208,0.00002567013,0.00003576809,0.002304367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845758,0.0002121954,0.1127596,0.0008713126,0.00001230625,0.001549477,8.349723e-7,0.000003258666,0.00001525431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.141038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.208662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1554013281579977,"score_gpt":0.3675768622646291,"score_spread":0.2121755341066314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}