{"id":"W2171278069","doi":"10.1002/smj.299","title":"Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2099,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proactivity; Stakeholder; Business; Perspective (graphical); Sample (material); Resource (disambiguation); Stakeholder management; Government (linguistics); Stakeholder theory; Environmental resource management; Environmental management system; Empirical research; Stakeholder analysis; Industrial organization; Economics; Management; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003929259,0.0005648311,0.0002349041,0.002186202,0.001531134,0.004499249,0.001010446,0.002602372,0.004775236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003999365,0.0001798893,0.0002897467,0.001192569,0.003618605,0.004230456,0.002458691,0.001321102,0.0002971414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002270341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002102704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001267053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001559926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949172,0.003633923,0.00007934659,0.000198429,0.0006395717,0.0005315683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959054,0.002270296,0.0004950052,0.000123773,0.0006482583,0.0005573327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000327961,0.0001468289,0.008558329,0.0003142697,0.00004580224,0.0008403543,0.009729785,0.004577441,0.001910326,0.9284466,0.004037076,0.04136032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003237671,0.0001859141,0.008512983,0.0008475194,0.00005293825,0.001027353,0.05583392,0.01809789,0.003071568,0.8054396,0.1068374,0.00006055478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899506,0.009177533,0.07977028,0.08243251,0.0002215655,0.0001615397,0.0001180658,0.00007612241,0.5380917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945098,0.0008006277,0.00188249,0.0008135733,0.00002804437,0.00002333543,0.00001281248,0.000004644221,0.001924512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004775236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02078015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03614575662410317,"score_gpt":0.219081528361847,"score_spread":0.1829357717377438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}