{"id":"W2171304027","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-3938.2008.00001.x","title":"Risk prediction: a review of the literature","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Forensic Nursing","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Risk assessment; Construct (python library); Forensic nursing; Systematic review; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); MEDLINE; Data science; Poison control; Medicine; Engineering; Political science; Computer security; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005155029,0.001515833,0.003315286,0.009455886,0.0006780289,0.002358263,0.002189097,0.002064417,0.004258957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01748131,0.0006978681,0.001715131,0.009029307,0.0007901674,0.003519687,0.00127994,0.001805093,0.0008532245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001879531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006139217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006631054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01034296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975133,0.0008270498,0.0006295987,0.0002504867,0.0007089957,0.00007062298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874902,0.009841534,0.001112135,0.0001225441,0.001264262,0.000169279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009017839,0.00008477715,0.001051433,0.1037638,0.0004180974,0.0002772587,0.0002806632,0.0004800371,0.00009464035,0.001666227,0.01582278,0.8759701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009945118,0.0003256157,0.01010522,0.579564,0.002666387,0.003932994,0.001509288,0.0007942263,0.0002931556,0.006882002,0.393704,0.000123589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001330889,0.9989952,0.0001159461,0.0003897493,0.00009293515,0.00001176327,0.00002235887,0.000003652029,0.000235281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001179299,0.9980451,0.0004340546,0.0001658698,0.00007440893,0.00001933806,0.00002042471,9.832061e-7,0.00006050176],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009455886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02726269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03374785099446989,"score_gpt":0.3636620688234705,"score_spread":0.3299142178290005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}