{"id":"W2171306798","doi":"10.1111/ele.12172","title":"Addressing a critique of the <scp>TEASI</scp> framework for invasive species risk assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Criticism; Abundance (ecology); Risk assessment; Ecology; Biology; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Business; Environmental science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04972291,0.001055834,0.001887992,0.001372557,0.007104699,0.007270727,0.006799773,0.0610482,0.005126494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1444724,0.001162688,0.002515218,0.00210064,0.01837236,0.009487138,0.007513123,0.1249972,0.005047027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009570394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01929239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0300442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04757137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9662994,0.008952634,0.003894997,0.004066417,0.01497372,0.001812976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8686005,0.08105961,0.003578087,0.005677626,0.03506044,0.006023652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355674,0.00002169657,0.0002178803,0.00007805848,0.00001329383,0.0001912009,0.0003341004,0.0002240427,0.0001316248,0.04167463,0.9413928,0.01570727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050898,0.00003991721,0.0008234401,0.0005680269,0.00002870996,0.0008035796,0.0005286419,0.001753979,0.0003902963,0.1208214,0.8740758,0.0001152383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009790519,0.0003836515,0.001625392,0.9912109,0.004555065,0.000007835168,0.00003620148,0.00003735701,0.002045669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002565431,0.0003265414,0.003200708,0.9836526,0.007398054,0.00006281833,0.00002958419,0.00006103543,0.002703284],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0610482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.262963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04498084174650112,"score_gpt":0.2903174754173919,"score_spread":0.2453366336708908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}