{"id":"W2171368158","doi":"10.1109/icsm.2015.7332455","title":"A comparative study on the bug-proneness of different types of code clones","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Code refactoring; clone (Java method); Computer science; Software bug; Code (set theory); Software maintenance; Programming language; Type (biology); Software system; Biology; Software; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000293591,0.00006822529,0.0001704528,0.00005470677,0.00001522515,0.00001568425,0.0006594311,0.00001335951,0.000005566307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001537207,0.00003612974,0.00002009712,0.0002161741,0.00004303725,0.00004490881,0.0002161742,0.00006792324,0.00001267429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001748673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003675909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005119701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001690202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991485,0.0000860657,0.0001238726,0.0001308273,0.0004074142,0.0001033411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985492,0.0007755616,0.00003424927,0.0004456543,0.0001537061,0.00004161956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002182482,0.005790721,0.743681,0.0001069157,0.0005356969,0.00001695976,0.07612725,0.01136473,0.005752361,0.1475959,0.006388359,0.00242189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009915364,0.00214734,0.8465164,0.00004655716,0.000009649179,0.000001825149,0.002877455,0.02963985,0.1157643,0.001719434,0.00008018586,0.0002054752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599262,0.00002471275,0.03911294,0.0001843465,0.00009250022,0.0002490875,0.000001061983,0.00004725272,0.0003618962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,4.368325e-7,0.0004974495,0.000006829443,0.000008674975,0.0000179679,1.485363e-7,0.000002973489,0.0001187959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1458765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1473328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1305259869970648,"score_gpt":0.3499606051970607,"score_spread":0.219434618199996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}