{"id":"W2171368158","doi":"10.1109/icsm.2015.7332455","title":"A comparative study on the bug-proneness of different types of code clones","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Code refactoring; clone (Java method); Computer science; Software bug; Code (set theory); Software maintenance; Programming language; Type (biology); Software system; Biology; Software; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004197181,0.0005199656,0.0005612581,0.005481359,0.0005235603,0.0008974287,0.0006036461,0.0006959249,0.0006547709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04625467,0.0002652632,0.0006486535,0.002656955,0.0006629182,0.001693184,0.0007595248,0.0004968987,0.0001388163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005022184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003936516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001381317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002617662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942611,0.001329087,0.0007651477,0.001170317,0.002206409,0.0002677833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8717147,0.08577193,0.01524457,0.008791817,0.01618618,0.002290866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001315722,0.0005488665,0.7596995,0.0008083045,0.0006641231,0.0009116597,0.005741612,0.007173365,0.05335675,0.0006203387,0.0007864324,0.1683734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005658033,0.002620192,0.9517575,0.00008102843,0.0003980998,0.002218879,0.002071959,0.02185011,0.01677941,0.0006010142,0.001462888,0.0001022069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972889,0.0002615136,0.001849408,0.00001403544,0.000005573278,0.00003201449,0.0001201679,0.0001021743,0.0003262682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938554,0.0001591718,0.004824508,0.00001248155,0.000008964484,0.00003701228,0.0006725954,0.00004220047,0.0003876884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005481359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02219707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1305259869970648,"score_gpt":0.3499606051970607,"score_spread":0.219434618199996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}