{"id":"W2171411107","doi":"10.1177/154193120004401273","title":"Systematic Evaluation of Office Ergonomics Training Programs","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Human factors and ergonomics; Measure (data warehouse); Training (meteorology); Process (computing); Engineering management; Engineering; Computer science; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1278384,0.001579994,0.004081862,0.01008241,0.001935238,0.001840424,0.001757639,0.001260506,0.001171968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2344662,0.001010757,0.002894055,0.005889184,0.001442368,0.001764237,0.002474746,0.001004768,0.0002238377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006567444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03515083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006099105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01518039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7906159,0.1380535,0.03639758,0.003508813,0.02936898,0.002055395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6988951,0.1553352,0.04627362,0.01006915,0.08512885,0.004298025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009834992,0.006092785,0.02442604,0.1058822,0.005323184,0.0002154348,0.008625341,0.00175398,0.002431045,0.0005288021,0.00240914,0.832477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04555582,0.1865775,0.3174331,0.281575,0.04295832,0.0007640088,0.02172026,0.00460958,0.02913389,0.002421648,0.06627547,0.0009755522],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.5864881,0.1373114,0.02859799,0.002223837,0.001313964,0.2321733,0.00286369,0.0003889845,0.008638683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.746682,0.04915265,0.0898588,0.0008685339,0.0004281869,0.109953,0.001576751,0.0000718018,0.001408255],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1278384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.676082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03633243891588331,"score_gpt":0.2852094955048934,"score_spread":0.2488770565890101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}