{"id":"W2171436100","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.003","title":"Using Decision-Analytic Modeling to Isolate Interventions That Are Feasible, Efficient and Optimal: An Application from the Norwegian Cervical Cancer Screening Program","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Cervical Cancer and HPV Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychological intervention; Triage; Cervical cancer; Medicine; Norwegian; Cervical screening; Cost–utility analysis; Actuarial science; Decision tree; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Gynecology; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Computer science; Cost effectiveness; Risk analysis (engineering); Cancer; Business; Data mining; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113062,0.0001238775,0.0003137148,0.000152939,0.0001587061,0.00007706129,0.0001566449,0.00006398042,0.00005722678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001289234,0.00009037847,0.00007276331,0.0005464283,0.0000368084,0.0000602642,0.0001353526,0.0003453974,0.00000556816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004341328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003285462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04176911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002783107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998153,0.0001562187,0.0003942686,0.0004136667,0.0005023243,0.0003804815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986021,0.0001233654,0.00007995198,0.0003700723,0.0001888235,0.0006357149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004016145,0.0002312076,0.0368573,0.0001587048,0.00002109649,0.000003323765,0.001119212,0.761093,0.000006006847,0.00004872505,0.000027236,0.2000325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008276057,0.0002482636,0.083831,0.0005778035,0.00003101498,0.000004764797,0.0009809763,0.9131184,0.000002401249,0.0001558642,0.0001410025,0.00008095925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8032526,0.002034634,0.1875572,0.005508704,0.00006748881,0.001476514,0.00002348486,0.00004379067,0.00003558634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773225,0.00009476323,0.02155266,0.0006825697,0.0001714708,0.0001297291,0.00001520636,0.000024532,0.000006552869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1999516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9646118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3930505713572423,"score_gpt":0.498982152553361,"score_spread":0.1059315811961187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}