{"id":"W2171530553","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0508036102","title":"Economic benefits of biodiversity exceed costs of conservation at an African rainforest reserve","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Opportunity cost; Rainforest; Revenue; Nature reserve; Natural resource economics; Tourism; Agroforestry; Ecosystem services; Ecotourism; Cost–benefit analysis; Willingness to pay; Business; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Environmental science; Biology; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001359388,0.00006639897,0.0002019505,0.0001782646,0.00009747471,0.00000732824,0.0004686933,0.00006576121,0.000103048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001133839,0.00006354349,0.00006782244,0.0001684452,0.0005831784,0.0007540979,0.000129184,0.00004773675,0.00001303721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002138666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001224966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001911844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007674043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990335,0.000002785851,0.0005592832,0.0001916417,0.0001197771,0.00009304236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986221,0.00005360452,0.001235477,0.00001419504,0.00004749682,0.00002708177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002182357,0.00004481093,0.8262087,0.000019078,0.0000144426,2.4998e-10,0.0003072302,0.002843984,0.003024649,0.1669193,0.0004230624,0.0001730045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002909382,0.00006268439,0.9444801,0.0000200906,0.000004903727,5.872794e-7,0.0001820713,0.004984844,0.03989741,0.009821014,0.0001827342,0.00007263623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896964,0.0001035692,4.805387e-7,0.001771301,0.00001512864,0.0001275238,0.0002301276,0.000002782241,0.008052642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991333,0.00007012658,0.000584305,0.0001039175,0.00002501628,0.000002584379,0.000001674693,0.000002064942,0.00007701097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1570983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2591228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1387510542495289,"score_gpt":0.2564707265057466,"score_spread":0.1177196722562177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}