{"id":"W2171530553","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0508036102","title":"Economic benefits of biodiversity exceed costs of conservation at an African rainforest reserve","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Opportunity cost; Rainforest; Revenue; Nature reserve; Natural resource economics; Tourism; Agroforestry; Ecosystem services; Ecotourism; Cost–benefit analysis; Willingness to pay; Business; Geography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Environmental science; Biology; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007856446,0.0001988651,0.000191594,0.00093077,0.0006301308,0.001181708,0.0002308928,0.0003806496,0.003095977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005111934,0.0001392377,0.0002206682,0.0009182601,0.0008228131,0.001638188,0.001198016,0.0004865839,0.00008572889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001239853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005793698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002642482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008986715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994009,0.0002322517,0.00002405135,0.00003335972,0.0001327941,0.0001766064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978473,0.0008497711,0.0006058379,0.0001558506,0.0002469571,0.0002942647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001210904,0.0003443554,0.7421721,0.0003001336,0.0003027546,0.001443579,0.001122688,0.05194622,0.006170218,0.05522399,0.001260598,0.1385026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000190547,0.000205774,0.9647087,0.00008151225,0.0001083024,0.0007475289,0.002003412,0.01426665,0.001001091,0.01323177,0.003603768,0.00002237535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929398,0.0001952321,0.0005649278,0.0002292178,0.00000415358,0.00001067678,0.0000557669,0.000001868305,0.005998312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994621,0.00005791579,0.0001889388,0.000009005919,0.000003043543,0.000003209702,0.00001298424,5.100372e-7,0.0002622587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003095977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01035708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1387510542495289,"score_gpt":0.2564707265057466,"score_spread":0.1177196722562177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}