{"id":"W2171932879","doi":"10.1109/case.1992.200160","title":"A framework for capturing design rationale using granularity hierarchies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Guangdong Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Granularity; Schematic; Computer science; Usability; Notation; Component (thermodynamics); Software; Software engineering; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Data mining; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005041118,0.00007954692,0.00008207146,0.0001023212,0.0001410714,0.0001515543,0.0003320577,0.00004835683,0.00001309009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001934641,0.00007583148,0.00004110424,0.0002711926,0.00002119442,0.0002394944,0.00005093466,0.0001223983,0.000006187749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004592998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001058806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009768056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.828441e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991401,0.00005484772,0.000101336,0.0002270789,0.0002108091,0.0002657774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997658,0.001889083,0.00001512311,0.0002999281,0.00007081245,0.00006707004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002967923,0.00002407336,0.001212619,0.00002297276,0.00001235644,0.000003541868,0.0003839104,0.01634373,0.0006764917,0.9802548,0.0001321833,0.0009303427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004111207,0.000067226,0.001658303,0.00004312633,0.000004702643,0.00003471838,0.00002567816,0.4263654,0.03711988,0.5318024,0.002084346,0.0003831944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006025806,0.00009027684,0.9929885,0.0001286402,0.0001798412,0.0003005251,5.14007e-7,0.0002100887,0.00007584067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2073054,0.000001111163,0.7924882,0.0000504474,0.00002690768,0.00003096391,2.690552e-7,0.000007389334,0.00008932305],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4484525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3092318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0966438150107016,"score_gpt":0.316822960167619,"score_spread":0.2201791451569174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}